logo
ส่งข้อความ
ข่าว
บ้าน > ข่าว > ข่าวบริษัท เกี่ยวกับ coaxial cable rg6 vs rg59
เหตุการณ์ที่เกิดขึ้น
ติดต่อเรา
ติดต่อตอนนี้

coaxial cable rg6 vs rg59

2025-11-24

ข่าวบริษัทล่าสุดเกี่ยวกับ coaxial cable rg6 vs rg59

H1: RG6 vs RG59 Coaxial Cable: What’s the Difference and Which One Do You Need?

Coaxial cables are everywhere—inside homes, satellites, security systems, telecom networks, and even inside IoT devices. Yet for many engineers, installers, and purchasing managers, one question continues to surface: Should I use RG6 or RG59? Both cables look similar from the outside, but their internal construction, signal performance, shielding, and ideal applications are dramatically different. Choosing the wrong one may cause signal loss, noise interference, shortened transmission distance, poor video quality, or broadband instability.

ข่าว บริษัท ล่าสุดเกี่ยวกับ coaxial cable rg6 vs rg59  0

Before we explore the deeper engineering differences, here is the short, clear answer you may be looking for:

RG6 is thicker, has better shielding, and supports higher frequencies, making it ideal for TV, satellite, and broadband internet. RG59 is thinner and more flexible but has higher signal loss, making it best for short-distance analog CCTV or low-frequency applications. If you need long runs or high-frequency performance, use RG6. If your installation is short and camera-based, RG59 may be sufficient.

What most people don’t realize is that the RG6 vs RG59 decision impacts much more than transmission distance—it affects EMI performance, connector compatibility, installation routing, and even long-term system reliability. Years ago, an engineer told me a story: a factory installed over 400 meters of RG59 for IP cameras, believing it was “just coax.” The result? Blurry video, intermittent signal dropouts, and three days of troubleshooting—only to discover they should have used RG6.

Let’s explore everything you need to know so you never have to make the same costly mistake.

H2: What Are RG6 and RG59 Coaxial Cables?

RG6 and RG59 are both 75-ohm coaxial cables used for video and RF signal transmission. RG6 has a thicker conductor, better shielding, and lower signal loss, making it suitable for broadband, satellite, and digital TV. RG59 is thinner, more flexible, and best for short-distance analog CCTV or low-frequency transmission. Although they look similar, their internal construction and ideal applications differ significantly.

Understanding what RG6 and RG59 are requires looking beyond surface appearance. Both belong to the “RG” family of standardized coax cables originally developed for military communication. Today, the RG naming convention remains widely used in TV broadcasting, broadband networks, security systems, and RF applications.

Despite their visual similarities—both are round, both are 75-ohm, and both typically use F-type or BNC connectors—the internal differences shape their performance dramatically. RG6 uses a thicker center conductor, often 18AWG, which reduces attenuation. Its dielectric material is usually made of higher-quality foam PE, giving it a higher velocity of propagation and better high-frequency response. RG59, on the other hand, usually has a 20–22AWG center conductor and solid PE dielectric, making it suitable only for lower or moderate frequency ranges.

Shielding is another major difference. RG6 often includes quad-shield designs (foil + braid + foil + braid) for environments with high electromagnetic interference, whereas RG59 typically uses single or dual shield. This shielding difference directly affects system reliability when cables run near power lines, machinery, or dense wiring environments.

Applications naturally follow these technical characteristics. RG6 is widely used for digital TV, cable modems, satellite dishes, RF signal distribution, and high-frequency systems. RG59 is used primarily in analog CCTV systems or legacy setups where frequency ranges remain relatively low.

H3: What Is RG6 Cable?

RG6 is a 75-ohm coax cable designed for high-frequency applications such as satellite, DVB-T, DOCSIS cable internet, and long-distance video distribution. It typically uses an 18AWG conductor, foam dielectric, and dual or quad shielding. Because of its lower signal loss, RG6 supports longer cable runs without requiring amplifiers. It is the standard choice for modern broadband and home entertainment systems.

H3: What Is RG59 Cable?

RG59 is also a 75-ohm coax cable, but it uses a thinner 20–22AWG conductor and lower-grade shielding. It supports lower frequencies and shorter distances, making it a common choice for analog CCTV or short-range video signals. Because it is thinner and more flexible, RG59 is easier to route in tight spaces, but it is not suitable for satellite, broadband internet, or long-distance high-frequency applications.

H3: Why Are Both Used in Consumer and Professional Installations?

RG6 addresses modern digital needs thanks to its high-frequency performance, while RG59 remains useful for legacy systems and short CCTV installations. This dual relevance explains why both cables still coexist in residential, commercial, and industrial markets.

H3: How Do I Know If My Cable Is RG6 or RG59?

The simplest method is to check the outer jacket printing. If unavailable, measure diameter: RG6 is typically ~7mm thick, while RG59 is ~6mm. RG6 feels stiffer due to thicker dielectric and shielding. Installers also check conductor gauge—RG6 is 18AWG; RG59 is 20–22AWG. In mixed installations, identifying the correct cable helps avoid compatibility or performance issues.

H2: How Do RG6 and RG59 Compare in Structure and Electrical Performance?

ข่าว บริษัท ล่าสุดเกี่ยวกับ coaxial cable rg6 vs rg59  1

RG6 and RG59 differ in conductor size, dielectric composition, shielding structure, and frequency handling. RG6 uses a thicker conductor and foam dielectric, resulting in lower attenuation and better high-frequency performance up to ~3 GHz. RG59 has a thinner conductor and higher loss, making it suitable only for low-frequency, short-distance applications below ~1 GHz. These construction differences directly affect signal quality, distance capability, and EMI resistance.

Parameter RG6 RG59
Impedance 75 Ω 75 Ω
Conductor Size 18 AWG 20–22 AWG
Dielectric Foam PE (high VOP) Solid PE
Shielding Dual / Quad Single / Dual
Attenuation Lower Higher
Max Frequency ~3 GHz ~1 GHz
Typical OD ~7.0 mm ~6.0 mm
Flexibility Moderate High
Best Use Satellite, broadband, digital TV Analog CCTV, short video runs

RG6 and RG59 may look similar externally, but their internal structure is designed for completely different electrical requirements. The main distinctions involve conductor diameter, insulation material, shielding type, cable diameter, attenuation performance, and usable frequency range. Understanding these details helps engineers and installers predict real-world behavior such as signal loss, interference, and distance limitations.

At the core, the conductor gauge is one of the most significant differences. RG6 typically uses an 18 AWG central conductor, while RG59 often uses 20–22 AWG. A larger conductor reduces DC resistance and improves performance at higher frequencies by lowering attenuation across long cable runs. This is the primary reason RG6 performs better for broadband, satellite, and digital TV signals.

The dielectric layer—which separates the conductor from the shield—also differs. RG6 usually employs a foam polyethylene dielectric, which provides a higher velocity of propagation by introducing more air pockets into the material. This improves performance in the hundreds of MHz to GHz range. In contrast, RG59 commonly uses solid polyethylene, which is more rigid and has a lower velocity of propagation, making it more suitable for low-frequency signals such as analog CCTV or baseband video.

Shielding structure is another critical factor. RG6 is available in dual-shield or quad-shield versions, which include multiple layers of aluminum foil and braided shielding. This shielding helps maintain signal integrity in electrically noisy environments—particularly important for cable internet or satellite installations. RG59 generally has only a single braid or a foil + braid combination, providing less EMI protection. For short, low-frequency signals this is usually sufficient, but for high-frequency transmission it becomes a limiting factor.

Due to these structural differences, attenuation performance varies considerably. At 100 MHz, RG6 has noticeably lower loss per meter than RG59. As frequency increases, the gap widens dramatically. This attenuation difference limits the practical run length of RG59, especially when dealing with high-bandwidth or long-distance installations.

Finally, the outer diameter (OD) contributes to mechanical performance. RG6 is typically around 7.0 mm in diameter, making it slightly more rigid but more durable. RG59, at about 6.0 mm, is thinner and more flexible, which helps when routing cables through tight conduits or equipment racks.

The engineering conclusion is simple: RG6’s thicker conductor, better dielectric, and stronger shielding make it the preferred option for high-frequency or long-distance applications. RG59 remains useful for older or low-frequency systems where flexibility and short cable runs are more important than bandwidth.

H3: What Are the Differences in Impedance, OD, and Shielding?

Both RG6 and RG59 have a nominal impedance of 75 ohms, but their physical dimensions differ. RG6 has a larger outer diameter (approx. 7 mm) to accommodate thicker dielectric and multiple shielding layers. RG59’s diameter of about 6 mm makes it more flexible but reduces available space for shielding. RG6 typically offers dual or quad shielding, providing improved noise rejection for high-frequency signals, while RG59 normally includes a single braid or foil-braid combination.

H3: How Does Frequency Performance Differ Between RG6 and RG59?

RG6 reliably supports frequencies up to 2–3 GHz, necessary for satellite dishes, DOCSIS modems, and digital TV distribution. RG59 generally supports frequencies below 1 GHz, with optimal performance under 50 MHz, making it suitable for analog CCTV or low-bandwidth baseband video. As frequency increases, RG59’s attenuation quickly rises, reducing distance capability and signal clarity.

H3: Can RG6 and RG59 Transmit Signals Up to What Frequency?

Typical usable frequency ranges are:

  • RG6: ~3 GHz maximum
  • RG59: ~1 GHz maximum

For high-bandwidth systems (internet, satellite, HDTV), RG6’s high-frequency capacity is essential. RG59 is acceptable only for low-frequency video where bandwidth demands are minimal.

H3: Why Does RG6 Have Lower Signal Loss?

RG6 has lower attenuation primarily due to its larger conductor (18 AWG) and foam dielectric with lower dielectric constant. These factors reduce both resistive loss and dielectric loss across long cable lengths. The thicker shielding also minimizes EMI-induced signal degradation, further improving overall performance in modern RF systems.

H3: Table: Key Technical Differences

Parameter RG6 RG59
Conductor Size 18 AWG 20–22 AWG
Dielectric Foam PE Solid PE
Shielding Dual or Quad Single or Dual
Usable Frequency Up to ~3 GHz Up to ~1 GHz
Attenuation Low Higher
OD ~7.0 mm ~6.0 mm
Ideal Use Satellite, broadband, digital TV Analog CCTV, short low-frequency runs

H2: Which Applications Use RG6 or RG59?

RG6 is used for TV, satellite, broadband internet, and high-frequency RF distribution due to its lower loss and stronger shielding. RG59 is used mainly for analog CCTV, DVR camera systems, and short-distance low-frequency video signals. Choose RG6 for digital or long-run installations, and RG59 for short analog camera setups or legacy equipment.

Understanding where RG6 and RG59 are used—and why—helps avoid costly installation mistakes. Although both are 75-ohm coaxial cables, their performance characteristics make them suitable for very different systems.

Installation Scenario Recommended Cable Reason
Satellite Dish to Receiver RG6 High-frequency (950–2150 MHz)
Cable Modem / Broadband RG6 Low loss, quad-shield options
Digital TV Distribution RG6 Supports >1 GHz frequencies
HD CCTV (AHD / TVI / CVI) RG6 Better long-distance performance
Analog CCTV (CVBS) RG59 Works well below 50 MHz
Short Indoor Video Runs RG59 Flexible, easy to route
FM/UHF/VHF Antenna RG6 Better RF performance
Legacy Composite Video RG59 Low-frequency compatible

RG6 in Modern Installations

RG6 dominates in today’s digital infrastructure because it performs extremely well at high frequencies. Cable TV, satellite dishes, and broadband internet all use frequency bands that extend well above 1 GHz—far beyond the reliable range of RG59. RG6 supports signals up to ~3 GHz, enabling reliable long-distance RF transmission with minimal signal attenuation.

Typical uses include:

  • Cable TV (DVB-T, QAM)
  • Satellite TV (950–2150 MHz)
  • DOCSIS cable modems
  • Broadband internet
  • Multi-room video distribution
  • RF antennas feeding into amplifiers
  • FM, VHF, and UHF broadcasting

Installations requiring outdoor exposure—such as satellite dishes—also benefit from RG6’s thicker jacket, stronger shielding, and UV-resistant options.

RG59 in Legacy and Specialized Installations

RG59 is best for low-frequency applications that do not require long-distance signal transmission. Analog CCTV systems operate at extremely low frequencies (below 50 MHz), and because these systems are typically installed within short distances (15–40 meters), RG59 works well and is more flexible to route.

Common RG59 applications:

  • Analog CCTV camera systems
  • CVBS baseband video
  • Older composite video equipment
  • Short indoor video runs
  • Low-frequency RF or test setups
  • Flexible routing inside tight enclosures

However, RG59 is not suitable for:

  • Satellite TV
  • Cable internet
  • Digital QAM channels
  • High-frequency antennas
  • Long cable runs (over 40–50 meters)

A Hybrid Reality in the Field

Many installers still encounter mixed environments. Old buildings may have RG59 embedded in walls, while modern systems require RG6. In such cases, performance problems often arise due to frequency mismatch. This is why many technicians recommend replacing RG59 with RG6 where feasible.

Let’s explore the applications in more detail.

H3: Which Cable Is Best for TV, Satellite, and Broadband Internet?

RG6 is the correct cable for all modern digital TV and internet systems. These services operate at high frequencies (600 MHz–2 GHz), far exceeding RG59’s range. RG6’s thicker conductor and quad-shield designs ensure stable transmission, even through longer runs or across multiple splits.

H3: Is RG59 Better for CCTV or Analog Camera Systems?

Yes—analog CCTV video signals fall well within RG59’s sweet spot. RG59's flexibility helps route cables inside buildings, and its lower cost makes it practical for large camera deployments. However, IP cameras (which use Ethernet, not coax) do not benefit from RG59.

H3: Do RF Antennas or IoT Devices Use RG6 or RG59?

Most RF antennas—including FM, UHF, and VHF—use RG6 because of higher frequency requirements. Some IoT boards or embedded RF modules may use micro-coax or RG174 internally, but building-level RF feeds almost always use RG6.

H3: When Should You Not Use RG59?

Avoid RG59 for:

  • Runs over 50 meters
  • Digital TV
  • Cable internet
  • Satellite dishes
  • Anything above ~1 GHz

Using RG59 in high-frequency systems causes severe loss, ghosting, pixelation, or complete signal failure.

H2: How Do Connectors Affect RG6 and RG59 Performance?

ข่าว บริษัท ล่าสุดเกี่ยวกับ coaxial cable rg6 vs rg59  2

Connectors impact signal quality by maintaining impedance, ensuring a stable mechanical fit, and minimizing insertion loss. RG6 typically uses F-type or BNC connectors designed for its larger diameter, while RG59 uses smaller BNC or RCA connectors. Using the wrong connector or poor-quality plating can cause signal reflections, loss, noise, or intermittent performance. Always match the connector to the cable type and frequency requirements.

Cable Type Common Connectors Typical Use Cases
RG6 F-Type, BNC TV, satellite, broadband
RG59 BNC, RCA CCTV, analog video
RG6 Quad-Shield Compression F-Type Outdoor setups, satellite
RG59 Flex Crimp BNC CCTV inside buildings

The performance of RG6 and RG59 depends not only on the cable itself but also on the connectors used. A coaxial system is only as strong as its weakest termination point—poor connectors or incorrect matching can disturb impedance, create reflections, and degrade overall signal stability.

Connector Type Differences

RG6 cables are physically thicker, requiring connectors with a larger ferrule and sleeve. F-type connectors are the most common on RG6 for television and broadband installations because they work well at high frequencies. BNC connectors are used when precise locking and quick coupling are required.

RG59’s smaller diameter makes it compatible with smaller BNC and RCA connectors. These are typically found in CCTV and short analog video systems.

Material and Plating Quality

Connector quality dramatically affects performance. Gold-plated contacts improve corrosion resistance and reduce micro-losses, while nickel-plated bodies provide durability. Poor plating or cheap materials can oxidize over time, increasing resistance and causing intermittent or degraded signals.

For RF applications above 1 GHz, connector precision becomes critical. Even a slightly loose F-type connector can cause major issues in a satellite or broadband setup.

Mechanical Fit and Shielding

A secure connection ensures consistent impedance. Loose connectors can introduce noise, increase VSWR, or create signal reflections. Quad-shield RG6 cables often require specially designed connectors to maintain shielding continuity.

Connector Termination Methods

There are three primary termination types:

  • Crimp connectors — fast and reliable for most installers
  • Compression connectors — best shielding and weather resistance
  • Twist-on connectors — low-cost, but not recommended for high-frequency applications

Compression connectors are the standard for satellite and broadband installations due to their strength and long-term stability.

Original vs. Compatible Connectors

Sino-Media provides both original-brand and high-quality compatible connectors.

  • Original connectors guarantee strict tolerance and certification compliance.
  • Compatible connectors offer cost-effective performance for most CCTV or low-frequency applications.

Matching the connector to both the cable diameter and the frequency range is essential.

H3: Which Connectors Are Common for RG6 (F-Type, BNC)?

RG6 frequently uses F-type connectors for TV and broadband because they support high frequencies with low loss. BNC connectors are sometimes added when a locking interface is required.

H3: Which Connectors Are Common for RG59 (BNC, RCA)?

BNC connectors dominate analog CCTV installations, while RCA connectors appear in older AV systems. Because RG59 is smaller, these connectors fit easily and do not require oversized ferrules.

H3: How Do Connector Quality and Plating Impact Signal Loss?

High-quality plating prevents corrosion and maintains a clean electrical interface. Better connectors reduce insertion loss and ensure long-term signal stability. Poor connectors cause pixelation, noise, or dropouts.

H3: Do You Need Original-Brand or Compatible Connectors?

Original-brand connectors are recommended for high-frequency, certification-sensitive systems such as satellite or DOCSIS internet. Compatible connectors are sufficient for CCTV, analog video, or budget installations.

H2: How to Choose Between RG6 and RG59 for Your Project?

Choose RG6 if your project requires high frequencies, long-distance runs, or digital TV/broadband signals. Use RG59 only for short, low-frequency analog CCTV or baseband video installations. Consider factors such as cable length, shielding needs, environmental exposure, and required bandwidth. If your system operates above 1 GHz or beyond 50 meters, RG6 is the correct choice.

Selecting the right cable is not simply a matter of choosing a diameter—it's about understanding the system requirements, the installation environment, the acceptable attenuation, and the frequency range. Many installation failures occur because cable selection was based on appearance instead of actual performance needs.

Requirement Use RG6 Use RG59
Long distance (>50m) ✔ Yes ✘ No
High frequency (>1 GHz) ✔ Yes ✘ No
Digital TV / Satellite ✔ Yes ✘ No
Analog CCTV (short run) ✘ Not needed ✔ Yes
Strong EMI environment ✔ Quad-shield RG6 ✘ Weak shielding
Tight installation spaces ✘ Stiffer ✔ More flexible

Distance and Signal Loss

RG6’s thicker conductor and foam dielectric significantly reduce attenuation. This makes RG6 the superior choice for anything involving:

  • Long cable runs (over 50 meters)
  • Multi-floor or multi-room distribution
  • Outdoor installations
  • Satellite dish to receiver cables

RG59 struggles at long distances. At just 30–40 meters, you may already see picture noise or broadband instability.

Frequency Requirements

Frequency is the single biggest factor.

  • Above 1 GHz → Use RG6
  • Below 50 MHz → RG59 is acceptable

Digital television, DOCSIS internet, and satellite signals all operate at hundreds of MHz or even into the GHz range. RG59 cannot maintain signal integrity at these frequencies.

Shielding and EMI Environment

In electrically noisy environments—factories, telecom rooms, near power lines—shielding matters.

RG6 typically comes in:

  • Dual shield
  • Quad shield (foil + braid + foil + braid)

Quad-shield RG6 offers far superior noise rejection.

RG59 is available mostly as:

  • Single shield
  • Double shield (less common)

If your system is sensitive to EMI, RG59 is rarely a safe choice.

Flexibility and Routing

RG59 is thinner and more flexible, making it easier to install in tight conduits or dense wiring bundles. Indoor CCTV installations sometimes prefer RG59 purely because it routes easily through complex ceiling pathways.

System Type

Here is a quick reference:

System Type Recommended Cable Reason
Satellite TV RG6 High frequency, long distance
Cable Internet RG6 Low loss, quad-shield options
Digital TV RG6 High-frequency support
Analog CCTV RG59 Works well at low frequencies
HD CCTV (AHD, TVI, CVI) RG6 Less attenuation over distance
FM/UHF/VHF antenna RG6 Broadband performance
Old composite AV RG59 Flexible, low-frequency

Environmental and jacket considerations

RG6 is often available with specialized jackets:

  • Outdoor UV-resistant
  • Flooded/gel-filled for burial
  • Fire-resistant or LSZH for commercial buildings

RG59 typically offers fewer jacket options.

Selecting the correct cable ultimately means matching its physical and electrical characteristics to your system requirements. If the installation must support modern digital systems or future upgrades, RG6 is usually the safer investment.

H3: Which Cable Is Better for Long-Distance Runs?

RG6 is superior because its thicker conductor and foam dielectric reduce signal loss significantly. It can run 100+ meters with manageable attenuation, while RG59 rarely performs well past 40–50 meters.

H3: Which One Offers Better EMI Shielding?

RG6 is available in quad-shield, making it better for areas with strong interference. RG59’s single or double shield cannot match RG6 in noisy environments.

H3: Is Flexibility or Cable OD More Important for Your Application?

RG59 is easier to install in tight spaces. However, flexibility should not overshadow performance. In systems requiring high-frequency stability, RG6 remains necessary even if routing is harder.

H3: What Questions Should Engineers Answer Before Selecting a Coax Cable?

Engineers should confirm:

  • What frequency does the system use?
  • What is the maximum cable length?
  • What level of shielding is needed?
  • Indoor or outdoor installation?
  • Will the system be upgraded later?
  • Which connector type is required?

Having this information ensures an optimal choice.

H2: How Does Sino-Media Support Custom RG6 and RG59 Coax Cable Assemblies?

Sino-Media provides custom RG6 and RG59 coaxial cable assemblies with fast drawings, no MOQ, rapid prototyping, and full certifications. Engineers can customize length, connectors, shielding, jackets, and environmental resistance. With 30-minute drawing turnaround and strict 100% inspection, Sino-Media supports OEMs, R&D teams, and distributors requiring reliable and flexible coaxial solutions.

Sino-Media stands out in the coaxial cable assembly market by offering engineering-driven customization, fast lead times, and global certification support. Unlike suppliers that only offer standard coax reels, Sino-Media specializes in custom-built assemblies tailored to specific electrical, mechanical, and environmental requirements.

Full Customization Options

Customers can specify the exact configuration needed:

  • Cable type: RG6, RG59, or other coax types
  • Cable length tolerance
  • Outer jacket (PVC, PE, LSZH, FEP, PU, UV-resistant, flame-retardant)
  • Connector type: F-type, BNC, RCA, SMA, N, or custom connectors
  • Pin-outs, polarity, and termination standards
  • Shielding level (dual or quad)
  • Environmental resistance (oil, UV, heat, cold, chemicals)

These capabilities support industries including satellite communication, broadcasting, security systems, industrial automation, medical electronics, and commercial installations.

Fast Engineering Drawings

Many customers come with incomplete information—sometimes just a picture of the cable. Sino-Media helps interpret requirements and creates professional CAD drawings within:

  • 30 minutes for urgent requests
  • 1–3 days standard

Every order includes a drawing for customer confirmation before production begins, preventing misunderstandings and ensuring precision.

Lead Time Advantages

Sino-Media offers:

  • Samples in 2–14 days
  • Urgent samples in 2–3 days
  • Mass production in 2–4 weeks
  • Urgent mass production in ~2 weeks

This speed allows R&D teams to prototype rapidly and OEM factories to meet tight deadlines.

Quality & Certification

All products undergo strict 100% inspection, including:

  • Process inspection
  • Final inspection
  • Pre-shipment inspection

Sino-Media provides full documentation:

  • UL
  • ISO
  • RoHS
  • REACH
  • PFAS
  • COC
  • COO

This is essential for global compliance, especially in Europe, the U.S., and Japan.

Serving Different Customer Types

  • Distributors receiving model-based requests
  • Engineers who care about precision and technical reliability
  • OEM factories focused heavily on pricing, scalability, and lead time
  • General purchasers needing drawing-based quotations

Each group benefits from Sino-Media’s flexibility, technical experience, and rapid responsiveness.

H3: What Custom Options Are Available (Length, Connector, Shielding, Jacket)?

Customers can customize cable type, jacket material, shielding level, connector style, strain relief, build orientation, and more. Every assembly is produced according to approved drawings.

H3: How Fast Are Engineering Drawings and Sample Lead Times?

Urgent drawings take as little as 30 minutes, and standard drawings take 1–3 days. Sample lead times range from 2–14 days depending on complexity.

H3: What Certifications Are Provided (UL, ISO, RoHS, REACH, PFAS)?

Sino-Media offers all major global certifications, enabling customers to pass regulatory approvals, compliance checks, and customs clearance with ease.

H3: Why Do Engineers, OEM Factories, and Distributors Choose Sino-Media?

Because Sino-Media combines engineering expertise, customization flexibility, fast response times, global certifications, and competitive pricing options—ideal for both high-end projects and cost-sensitive OEM orders.

Conclusion: Ready to Source Custom RG6 or RG59 Assemblies?

Choosing between RG6 and RG59 is only the first step. Once you know the right cable type, you also need the correct connectors, shielding level, environmental protection, and precise assembly details.

Sino-Media is ready to help—whether you’re an engineer defining a new product, a distributor quoting large quantities, or an OEM factory demanding consistent quality and fast delivery.


ส่งข้อสอบของคุณตรงมาหาเรา

นโยบายความเป็นส่วนตัว จีน คุณภาพดี สายไมโครโคแอกเชียล ผู้จัดจําหน่าย.ลิขสิทธิ์ 2021-2025 Shenzhen Sino-Media Technology Co., Ltd. สิทธิทั้งหมดถูกเก็บไว้